DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
22CV1577·eldorado·Civil·Eminent Domain/Evidentiary
Hearing about 2 months agoCONTINUED

COUNTY OF EL DORADO vs. WANDA H. NAGEL

CCP 1260.040 FOR DETERMINATION OF LEGAL/EVIDENTIARY ISSUES

Hearing date
Jun 26, 2026
Department
9
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 17, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCOUNTY OF EL DORADO
DefendantWANDA H. NAGEL

Ruling

June 26, 2026 Dept. 9 Tentative Rulings

9. 22CV1577 COUNTY OF EL DORADO vs. WANDA H. NAGEL CCP 1260.040 FOR DETERMINATION OF LEGAL/EVIDENTIARY ISSUES

For purposes of judicial economy and on the court’s own motion, the motion is continued to July 17, 2026 at 1:30pm to be heard with any other motions in limine. TENTATIVE RULING #9: MOTION IS CONTINUED TO JULY 17, 2026 AT 8:30AM IN DEPARTMENT 9. NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY TELEPHONE TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6551 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V.

SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY TELEPHONE OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; EL DORADO COUNTY LOCAL RULE 8.05.07. PROOF OF SERVICE OF SAID NOTICE MUST BE FILED PRIOR TO OR AT THE HEARING. LONG CAUSE HEARINGS MUST BE REQUESTED BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED AND THE PARTIES ARE TO PROVIDE THE COURT WITH THREE MUTUALLY AGREEABLE DATES ON FRIDAY AFTERNOONS AT 2:30 P.M.

LONG CAUSE ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTS WILL BE SET FOR HEARING ON ONE OF THE THREE MUTUALLY AGREEABLE DATES ON FRIDAY AFTERNOONS AT 2:30 P.M. THE COURT WILL ADVISE THE PARTIES OF THE LONG CAUSE HEARING DATE AND TIME BY 5:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. PARTIES MAY PERSONALLY APPEAR AT THE HEARING.

16

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share