DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26PR0093·eldorado·Civil·Probate
Hearing 3 months agoGRANTED

In the Matter of Roberta F. Larsen

Petition for Letters Testamentary

Hearing date
Jun 1, 2026
Department
9
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Jun 7, 2027

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Ruling

JUNE 1, 2026 Dept. 9 Probate Tentative Rulings

8. 26PR0093 IN THE MATTER OF ROBERTA F. LARSEN ESTATE HEARING Petition for Letters Testamentary Decedent died testate on November 8, 2025, survived by two adult sons Petitioner is decedent’s son The Petition requests full authority under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. Petitioner was named as Executors in The Will was lodged with the court The Will waives bond. A Duties/Liabilities statement (DE 147/DE 147s) was filed on April 16, 2026. Proof of service of notice of the hearing on the Petition was filed on May 6, 2026. Additionally, proof of publication was filed on May 29, 2026.

The court intends to grant the petition as requested. TENTATIVE RULING #8: ABSENT OBJECTION THE PETITION IS GRANTED AS REQUESTED. ANY PERSON WHO HAS AN OBJECTION MAY MAKE IT ANY TIME, EVEN ORALLY AT THE HEARING (PROBATE CODE § 1043). A STATUS OF ADMINISTRATION HEARING IS SET FOR 8:30 A.M. ON MONDAY, JUNE 7, 2027, IN DEPARTMENT NINE BY WHICH TIME THE COURT EXPECTS RECEIPTS AND AN EX PARTE PETITION FOR FINAL DISCHARGE (JUDICIAL COUNCIL FORM DE-295) TO BE FILED WITH THE COURT. PETITIONER OR COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PERSONALLY APPEAR, OR FILE A STATUS UPDATE WITH THE COURT AT LEAST TWO WEEKS BEFORE THAT HEARING.

IF A PARTY OR PARTIES WISH TO APPEAR REMOTELY, INSTRUCTIONS FOR REMOTE APPEARANCES CAN BE FOUND ON THE COURT’S WEBSITE. APPEARANCES ARE REQUIRED AT 8:30 A.M. ON MONDAY, JUNE 1, 2026, IN DEPARTMENT NINE.

10

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share