DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25PR0012·eldorado·Civil·Probate
Hearing 3 months agoGRANTED

Matter of Dover

Petition for Final Distribution

Hearing date
May 11, 2026
Department
Dept. 9
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
May 10, 2027

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Ruling

May 11, 2026 Dept. 9 Probate Tentative Rulings

2. 25PR0012 MATTER OF DOVER Petition for Final Distribution

Letters of Administration were issued on March 24, 2025, granting Petitioner full authority under the Independent Administration of Estates Act.

A Final Inventory and Appraisal was filed on May 20, 2025.

Proof of Service of Notice of the hearing on the Petition was filed on May 11, 2026. No one has filed a request for special notice in this proceeding.

The proposed distribution of the estate includes full distribution to Petitioner.

The Petition requests:

1. The administration of the estate be brought to a close without the requirement of an accounting;

2. The Waiver of Account and Report of Administrator be settled, allowed and approved;

3. All acts and proceedings of the Administrator be confirmed and approved;

4. Distribution of the estate in Petitioner’s hands and any other property of the estate not now known or later discovered be distributed to the beneficiaries as set forth in the Petition; and,

5. Upon filing of receipts and the Ex Parte Petition for Discharge, Petition may be discharged and released from all liability that may be incurred thereafter.

TENTATIVE RULING #2: ABSENT OBJECTION THE PETITION IS GRANTED AS REQUESTED. ANY PERSON WHO HAS AN OBJECTION MAY MAKE IT ANY TIME, EVEN ORALLY AT THE HEARING (PROBATE CODE § 1043). A STATUS OF ADMINISTRATION HEARING IS SET FOR 8:30 A.M. ON MONDAY, MAY 10, 2027, IN DEPARTMENT NINE. PETITIONER OR COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PERSONALLY APPEAR, OR FILE A STATUS UPDATE WITH THE COURT AT LEAST TWO WEEKS BEFORE THAT HEARING.

IF A PARTY OR PARTIES WISH TO APPEAR REMOTELY, INSTRUCTIONS FOR REMOTE APPEARANCES CAN BE FOUND ON THE COURT’S WEBSITE.

3

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share