DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
PP20200127·eldorado·Civil·Probate
Hearing 4 months agoGRANTED

ESTATE OF ARANDA

Petition for Initial Distribution

Hearing date
May 4, 2026
Department
9
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Sep 14, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$10,000$10,000$5,000$5,000$10,000

Parties

OtherMarseco Aranda
OtherMarsesca Elaine Zimmerman
OtherJose Marseco Aranda
OtherMichelle Angela Tellez
OtherMichael Travis Cordero
OtherElizabeth Ann Lopez

Ruling

May 4, 2026 Dept. 9 Probate Tentative Rulings

2. PP20200127 ESTATE OF ARANDA Petition for Initial Distribution

Petitioner and personal representative of the Estate of Marseco Aranda, submits this Petition for Initial Distribution of Estate pursuant to Probate Code §11620.

Decedent died on April 12, 2020. The estate mostly consists of real property, which is being sold. There are no known creditors of the estate and the time for filing of claims has expired.

Decedent’s Will provides for several specific monetary gifts as follows: $10,000 to Marsesca Elaine Zimmerman, $10,000 to Jose Marseco Aranda, $5,000 to Michelle Angela Tellez, $5,000 to Michael Travis Cordero, and $10,000 to Elizabeth Ann Lopez. The residue of the estate goes to Petitioner.

Petitioner will advance the necessary funds to the Estate in order to fulfill the specific gifts, with the understanding that Petitioner will be reimbursed from the estate once the real property is sold.

There is no objection. TENTATIVE RULING #2: ABSENT OBJECTION THE PETITION IS GRANTED AS REQUESTED. ANY PERSON WHO HAS AN OBJECTION MAY MAKE IT ANY TIME, EVEN ORALLY AT THE HEARING (PROBATE CODE § 1043). THE STATUS OF ADMINISTRATION HEARING SET FOR 8:30 A.M. ON MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2026, IN DEPARTMENT NINE REMAINS ON CALENDAR. PETITIONER OR COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PERSONALLY APPEAR, OR FILE A STATUS UPDATE WITH THE COURT AT LEAST TWO WEEKS BEFORE THAT HEARING.

IF A PARTY OR PARTIES WISH TO APPEAR REMOTELY, INSTRUCTIONS FOR REMOTE APPEARANCES CAN BE FOUND ON THE COURT’S WEBSITE.

2

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share