DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV2028·eldorado·Civil·Civil
Hearing 2 months agoGRANTED

COETZEE v. LOMELLI-DIAZ, ET AL.

Motion for Attorney Withdrawal

Hearing date
Jun 12, 2026
Department
Not specified
Prevailing
Moving Party
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCOETZEE
DefendantLOMELLI-DIAZ

Ruling

LAW AND MOTION CALENDAR JUNE 12, 2026

2. COETZEE v. LOMELLI-DIAZ, ET AL., 24CV2028

Motion for Attorney Withdrawal

TENTATIVE RULING # 2: MOTION IS GRANTED. WITHDRAWAL WILL BE EFFECTIVE AS

OF THE DATE OF FILING PROOF OF SERVICE OF THE FORMAL, SIGNED ORDER UPON

THE CLIENT. NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD (LEWIS v. SUPERIOR COURT

(1999) 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247), UNLESS A NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAR AND

REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE

COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY TELEPHONE TO THE COURT AT (530) 573-3042 BY 4:00 P.M.

ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF AN INTENT

TO APPEAR MUST BE MADE BY TELEPHONE OR IN PERSON. PROOF OF SERVICE OF

SAID NOTICE MUST BE FILED PRIOR TO OR AT THE HEARING.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share