DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
FL0003820·nevada·Civil·Dissolution
Hearing 2 months agoCONTINUED

Beck, Molina v. Freestone, Timothy

Status Conference

Hearing date
Jun 5, 2026
Department
3
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Dec 4, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerBeck, Molina
RespondentFreestone, Timothy

Attorneys

Klein, W. Gregoryfor Petitioner

Ruling

STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION 06/05/2026, 9:00 a.m. Department 3

Case No. FL0003820 Petitioner: Beck, Molina Attorney: Klein, W. Gregory Respondent: Freestone, Timothy Attorney: Self-Represented

1. Status Conference is continued to 12/04/2026, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 12/02/2026.

2. The Court notes that the following are still required: a. FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner. b. FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent. c. Proof of Service has not been received. If the parties want the date of termination of marital status calculated from date of service rather than from date of filing Response, the proof of service must be filed.

3. The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 12/04/2026, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.

4. The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.

__________________________________________________________________

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share