DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
FL0003233·nevada·Civil·Family Law
Hearing 4 months agoCONTINUED

Slattery, Heather Sue v. Slattery, Shane Michael

Status Conference

Hearing date
May 1, 2026
Department
3
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Nov 6, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerSlattery, Heather Sue
RespondentSlattery, Shane Michael

Ruling

STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION 05/01/2026, 9:00 a.m. Department 3

Case No. FL0003233 Petitioner: Slattery, Heather Sue Attorney: Self-Represented Respondent: Slattery, Shane Michael Attorney: Self-Represented

1. Status Conference is continued to 11/06/2026, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 11/03/2026.

2. The Court notes that the following are still required: a. Corrected FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner. Current FL-141 does not have complete information for the date and delivery method of the documents. b. Corrected FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent. Current FL-141 does not have complete information for the date and delivery method of the documents.

3. The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 11/06/2026, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.

4. The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.

__________________________________________________________________

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share