DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
PFL20190068·eldorado·Civil·Family Law
Hearing 2 months agoDROPPED

Rentachintala Sahithi v. Pavan Srikonda

Passport and travel bond waiver

Hearing date
Jun 18, 2026
Department
5
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffRentachintala Sahithi
DefendantPavan Srikonda

Ruling

LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 June 18, 2026 8:30 a.m./1:30 p.m.

9. RENTACHINTALA SAHITHI V. PAVAN SRIKONDA PFL20190068

On March 17, 2026, Petitioner filed a Request for Order (RFO) seeking orders regarding the child’s passport and a travel bond waiver. This is a post-judgment RFO and as such, personal service of the moving papers would generally be required. However, on April 10th the court made an ex parte order authorizing electronic service. In accordance with that order, the RFO was electronically served on April 17, 2026, however Petitioner failed to serve a blank Responsive Declaration to Request for Order and the Notice of Tentative Ruling.

This matter is dropped from calendar due to lack of proper service.

TENTATIVE RULING #9: THIS MATTER IS DROPPED FROM CALENDAR DUE TO LACK OF PROPER SERVICE.

NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share