DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
FL0002570·nevada·Civil·Family Law
Hearing 5 months agoPersonal appearance required

Cook, Jeffrey v. Cook, Christina

Status Conference

Hearing date
Apr 3, 2026
Department
3
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerCook, Jeffrey
RespondentCook, Christina

Attorneys

Walters, Cleatfor Petitioner

Ruling

STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION 04/03/2026, 9:00 a.m. Department 3

Case No. FL0002570 Petitioner: Cook, Jeffrey Attorney: Walters, Cleat Respondent: Cook, Christina Attorney: Self-Represented

1. This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.

2. The Court notes that the following are still required: a. FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner. b. Corrected FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons. FL-115 is not complete. The address information is missing. If the original server is not available to correct this, the documents will need to be re-served. When the Court has the correct Proof of Service, the Court requires one of the following: i. FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR ii.

Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR iii. FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner more than thirty days after Petition package has been served. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141.

3. The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.

__________________________________________________________________

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share