DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24FL0197·eldorado·Civil·Custody Review
Hearing 5 months agoMATTER IS DROPPED FROM CALENDAR.

RUBEN WILBURN V. HEATHER VOGEL

Review hearing

Hearing date
Mar 26, 2026
Department
5
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffRUBEN WILBURN
DefendantHEATHER VOGEL

Ruling

LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 March 26, 2026 8:30 a.m./1:30 p.m.

19. RUBEN WILBURN V. HEATHER VOGEL 24FL0197

Petitioner filed a Request for Order (RFO) on August 18, 2025, seeking a modification of the current parenting plan orders. The parties were referred to Child Custody Recommending Counseling (CCRC) with an appointment on September 18, 2025, and a review hearing on November 6, 2025. Respondent was personally served on August 25, 2025.

Both parties appeared at CCRC and reached a full agreement. The parties submitted a stipulation to the court on September 24, 2025. The court signed and adopted the parties’ stipulation as its order on September 24th. The stipulation set a further review hearing for March 26, 2026, at 1:30 PM in Department 5.

Neither party has filed a Supplemental Declaration. The court finds the prior orders continue to be in the best interest of the minor. All prior orders remain in effect. The matter is dropped from calendar.

TENTATIVE RULING #19: ALL PRIOR ORDERS REMAIN IN EFFECT. AS NEITHER PARTY FILED A SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION, THE MATTER IS DROPPED FROM CALENDAR.

NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share