DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25-CLJ-02260·sanmateo·Civil·Motion to Deem Matters Admitted
Hearing in about 3 hoursGRANTED

PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC VS JUAN SEGURA GONZALEZ

MOTION FOR ORDER THAT MATTERS IN REQUEST FOR ADMISSION OF TRUTH OF FACTS BE DEEMED ADMITTED

Hearing date
Aug 19, 2026
Department
28
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffPORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC
DefendantJUAN SEGURA GONZALEZ

Attorneys

DONALD SHERRILLfor Plaintiff

Ruling

August 19, 2026 Law and Motion Calendar Judge Nicole S. Healy Department 28 ________________________________________________________________________ 2:00 PM LINE 6 25-CLJ-02260 PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC VS JUAN SEGURA GONZALEZ

PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC DONALD SHERRILL JUAN SEGURA GONZALEZ PRO PER

MOTION FOR ORDER THAT MATTERS IN REQUEST FOR ADMISSION OF TRUTH OF FACTS BE DEEMED ADMITTED

TENTATIVE RULING:

The unopposed motion is granted. The genuineness of any documents and the truth of any matters in plaintiff’s Requests for Admission, Set One, are deemed admitted.

If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the court. Thereafter, plaintiff’s counsel shall prepare a written order consistent with the court’s ruling for the court’s signature, providing written notice of the ruling to all parties who have appeared in this action, pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312 and Local Rule 3.403(b)(iv), which states in part that the “prevailing party on a tentative ruling is required to prepare a proposed order repeating verbatim the tentative ruling” (emphasis added). The order should be e-filed only, do not email or mail a hard copy to the court.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share