DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
PR26-00031·plumas·Civil·Probate
Hearing 2 months agoAbsent objection, the court will grant the Petition

Estate of Bauer, Karen Louise

Petition

Hearing date
Jun 8, 2026
Department
Two
Prevailing
Petitioner
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

RespondentBauer, Karen Louise

Ruling

Case No. PR19-00038 Guardianship of Jeskey, Simone

Tentative Ruling: Appearance Required: Court has not received the Confidential Guardianship Status Report (form GC-251) from the Guardian. Matter is continued to July 13, 2026 at 9:00 am. Clerk is directed to provide notice to the guardian.

Case No. PR13-00021 Guardianship of Kaufman, Tesla L.

Tentative Ruling: No Appearance is Required: Court has received the Confidential guardianship Report (form GC-251) from the Guardian, and finds that it is in the best interests of the Ward to continue the Guardianship. Set Bi-annual Review 5/22/2028 at 9:00 am. Guardian to file GC-251 prior to the hearing.

Case No. PR16-00038 Guardianship of Mathis, Trinity J.

Tentative Ruling: Appearance Required: Court has not received the Confidential Guardianship Status Report (form GC-251) from the Guardian. Matter is continued to July 13, 2026 at 9:00am. Clerk is directed to provide notice to the guardian.

Case No. PR21-00047 Guardianship of Ralston, Skylar Orion

Tentative Ruling: Appearance Required: Court has not received the Confidential Guardianship Status Report (form GC-251) from the Guardian. Matter is continued to July 13, 2026 at 9:00am. Clerk is directed to provide notice to the guardian.

Case No. PR26-00031 Estate of Bauer, Karen Louise

Tentative Ruling: No Appearance Required: Absent objection the court will grant the Petition and sign the Order.

LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – 9:30 a.m.

Case No. CV26-00074 Barton, Barr et al vs. Womack, Brett et al

Tentative Ruling: Appearance Required: This matter is continued to June 22, 2026 at 9:30am for hearing on Petition to be heard by Judge Abramson.

3

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share