DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
22PR00572·santabarbara·Civil·Guardianship
Hearing about 1 month agoAttorney's fees reduced

Guardianship of Arian Anthony Santos

Review: Second Accounting and Report

Hearing date
Jul 6, 2026
Department
Prevailing
Opposing Party
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$5,547.75$3,950$501.10$4,451.10

Ruling

Case Number

Case Type Guardianship Hearing Date / Time Mon, 07/06/2026 - 08:30 Nature of Proceedings Review: Second Accounting and Report Tentative Ruling Probate Notes: Appearances permitted to address notes, but not required.

After review of the Second Supplement filed on June 22, 2026, the following is noted for the Court: Reduction of Attorney's Fees recommended. The requested attorney's fees of $5,547.75 should only be approved for $3,950, because several billing entries reveal what is 1) clerical work and 2) reveal entries formally referred to as "duplicative work" or "padding," and more commonly known as "remedial work" to correct Court-identified discrepancies in the accounting.

This is confirmed in the Second Supplement attorney for the Guardian filed on June 22, 2026, where attorney confirmed that some of the time billed for the First Accounting was to correct discrepancies in the First Accounting that were identified in the Probate Notes.

Attorney's fees are within the sound discretion of the Court, and can be reduced for a multitude of reasons. (PLCM Group v. Drexler (2000) 22 Cal.4th 1084, 1096.) One of those factors is "padding." (Premier Medical Management Systems, Inc. v. California Insurance Guarantee Association (2008) 163 Cal.App.4th 550, 556 ["padding' in the form of inefficient or duplicative efforts is not subject to compensation."].)

In this case, the account was simple, straight forward, and was admittedly compiled by an accountant paid out of the estate. (2 nd Sup. P.8a.) In that accounting, the billing statement from the attorney shows work done on the first accounting to remedy discrepancies noted by the court that the attorney needed to correct. This remedial work consisted of a sizable portion of the 7.95 hours billed for the First Accounting, for which some of those fees this Court already approved.

As for the Second Accounting, the descriptions of the work performed reveal that much of the work performed was for work that was clerical, not legal in nature, and the account was so simple that hardly any attorney's fees need have been generated. The rate this court usually allows for clerical work is $65 per hour. Therefore, the fee request in this case should be disallowed in part, leaving a fee award of $3,950 plus $501.10 in agreed-upon costs, for a total for $4,451.10.

Tentative Ruling: Estate of George Stephen Cochran Tentative Ruling: Estate of George Stephen Cochran

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share