DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CU0002197·nevada·Civil·Default
Hearing 2 months agoSet

American Express National Bank vs. Dion Reif

Default prove up hearing

Hearing date
Jun 8, 2026
Department
6
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 7, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffAmerican Express National Bank
DefendantDion Reif

Ruling

June 8, 2026, Case Management Conference Tentative Rulings

1. CL0003904 William E. Oder v. Scott Raitt No appearances are required. On its own motion, the Court continues the case management conference to September 21, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file a proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of Defendant no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference date.

2. CU0001386 Rise Grass Valley, Inc. vs. Board of Supervisors of Nevada County, et al. Appearances are required. The parties shall be prepared to update the Court on their requested briefing schedule regarding the second cause of action.

3. CU0001908 Robert Bovill vs. Tahoe Donner Association No appearances are required. The Court continues the case management conference date to September 21, 2026 at 9:00 a.m., in Department 6 to provide the parties additional time to complete mediation. No later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference date, the parties shall submit a joint statement on the status of mediation.

Additionally, neither party filed a timely case management conference statement and all are admonished that failing to file a statement in the future may result in sanctions.

4. CU0002003 Alliance Funding Group vs. Nevada County Mead Company LLC, et al. No appearances are required. The default hearing set for July 17, 2026, at 1:00 p.m., in Department 6, is confirmed.

5. CU0002197 American Express National Bank vs. Dion Reif No appearances are required. A default prove up hearing is set for August 7, 2026, at 1:30 p.m., in Department 6.

6. CU0002468 Alberto Solano Pancheco, III. vs. Robert Thomas, et al. No appearances are required. On the Court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to September 21, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 6, to permit adjudication of pending motions.

7. CU0002473 Jordan Cicogni vs. Shell USA, Inc., et al. No appearances are required. On its own motion, the Court continues the case management conference to September 21, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6. A Cross-Complaint has recently been filed. Cross-Complainant shall file a proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of Cross-Defendants no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference date.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share