Guardianship of Carson McLean Pembroke
Appointment of Guardian
Motion type
Ruling
3. Guardianship of Kehlani Isabella Zamudio Velez 26PR00134 Appointment of Guardian
TENTATIVE RULING: APPEARANCES ARE NOT REQUIRED. A review of the court file reveals that no further documentation or effort to cure the deficiencies previously noted in the petition has been submitted. Accordingly, pursuant to the Court’s ruling on July 21, 2026, the petition is DENIED and the matter is dismissed.
4. Guardianship of Heather Jean Mello 26PR00167 Readiness Conference
TENTATIVE RULING:
APPEARANCES ARE REQUIRED. The parties are to appear and explain whether the matter has been resolved. If the case has not resolved by way of agreement, the parties are to announce whether they are prepared to go forward on the currently scheduled trial date of August 28, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. The parties are to perfect the witness list and document exchange, as well as submit the same to the Court. Finally, all parties are hereby advised that strict compliance with local rules will be required. They should take special review Local Rules 6.2.F. which requires, among other things, that parties meet and confer for purposes of making reasonable efforts to informally resolve any controversies and to file Statements of Issues or Settlement prior to an evidentiary hearing.
5. Guardianship of Carson McLean Pembroke 26PR00602 Appointment of Guardian
TENTATIVE RULING:
APPEARANCES ARE NOT REQUIRED. Absent objection, the Petition for Guardianship is GRANTED and the Court will sign the proposed order submitted by Petitioner(s). Petitioner/Guardian is directed to file the Confidential Guardianship Status Report, GC-251, within one year and 30 days from the date of the order granting the Petition for Guardianship, and annually
thereafter. (Form GC-251 is available at the following URL: https://www.courts.ca.gov/forms.htm) To ensure compliance with the requirement of an annual GC-251, this matter is SET for Case Management Conference at 9:00 a.m. on September 7, 2027, in Department 61. If the Guardian has at that time filed the required GC-251, an appearance will be waived and a new hearing date shall be set for one year out for the filing of the annual Status Report. Further advisements which are not part of tentative ruling: If any objections are filed at or before the time of hearing, the Court will not adopt the tentative ruling and will, instead, set the matter for a contested hearing and the parties will be notified by the Court as to when they should next appear.
6. Guardianship of Cameron Imani Kohler 26PR00717 Appointment of Guardian
TENTATIVE RULING:
APPEARANCES ARE NOT REQUIRED. Absent objection, the Petition for Guardianship is GRANTED and the Court will sign the proposed order submitted by Petitioner(s). Petitioner/Guardian is directed to file the Confidential Guardianship Status Report, GC-251, within one year and 30 days from the date of the order granting the Petition for Guardianship, and annually thereafter. (Form GC-251 is available at the following URL: https://www.courts.ca.gov/forms.htm) To ensure compliance with the requirement of an annual GC-251, this matter is SET for Case Management Conference at 9:00 a.m. on September 7, 2027, in Department 61.
If the Guardian has at that time filed the required GC-251, an appearance will be waived and a new hearing date shall be set for one year out for the filing of the annual Status Report. Further advisements which are not part of tentative ruling: If any objections are filed at or before the time of hearing, the Court will not adopt the tentative ruling and will, instead, set the matter for a contested hearing and the parties will be notified by the Court as to when they should next appear.
7. Guardianship of Genesis Carlos Carreno 26PR00725 Appointment of Guardian
TENTATIVE RULING:
APPEARANCES ARE NOT REQUIRED. Absent objection, the Petition for Guardianship is GRANTED and the Court will sign the proposed order submitted by Petitioner(s).
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”