DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24PR0065·eldorado·Civil·Probate
Hearing 9 days agoCONTINUED

ESTATE OF JAMES HAYNES

Status of Administration

Hearing date
Aug 10, 2026
Department
9
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 21, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$263,191.18

Ruling

August 10, 2026 Dept. 9 Probate Tentative Rulings

6. 24PR0065 ESTATE OF JAMES HAYNES STATUS OF ADMINISTRATION

ON THE COURT'S OWN MOTION DUE TO LACK OF JUDICIAL COVERAGE, THE COURT WILL HEAR THIS MATTER ON SEPTEMBER 21, 2026, AT 8:30 A.M. IN DEPARTMENT NINE. THERE WILL BE NO HEARING ON AUGUST 10, 2026. Letters Testamentary were issued on May 20, 2024.

An Inventory and Appraisal was filed on January 14, 2026. However, the inventory and Appraisal has no values or breakdown. It states nothing other than a total value of the estate without explanation of $263,191.18.

A Declaration Regarding Inventory and Appraisal was filed on July 8, 2026, which clarified that the estate consisted of one savings account held at Golden 1 Credit Union, which had a balance of $263,191.18 at the time of death. An updated Inventory and Appraisal was included within the Declaration. Decedent owed no real property at the time of death and thereby no change of ownership statement was filed as provided in section 480 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code.

A Petition for Final Distribution was filed on April 17, 2026. The hearing was continued to August 17, 2026.

TENTATIVE RULING #6: APPEARANCES ARE REQUIRED AT 8:30 A.M. ON MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 2026, IN DEPARTMENT NINE. A STATUS OF ADMINISTRATION HEARING IS SET FOR 8:30 A.M. ON MONDAY, AUGUST 9, 2027, IN DEPARTMENT NINE. PETITIONER OR COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PERSONALLY APPEAR, OR FILE A STATUS UPDATE WITH THE COURT AT LEAST TWO WEEKS BEFORE THAT HEARING. IF A PARTY OR PARTIES WISH TO APPEAR BY ZOOM, PLEASE CONTACT THE COURT AT (530) 621-5867 AND MEETING INFORMATION WILL BE PROVIDED.

7

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share