DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25PR0160·eldorado·Civil·Probate
Hearing 16 days agoCONTINUED

ESTATE OF CONSUELO R. RAMIREZ

Status of Administration

Hearing date
Aug 3, 2026
Department
9
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 2, 2027

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Ruling

August 3, 2026 Dept. 9 Probate Tentative Rulings

1. 25PR0160 ESTATE OF CONSUELO R. RAMIREZ STATUS OF ADMINISTRATION

Letters Testamentary were issued on August 4, 2025.

An Inventory and Appraisal was filed on July 17, 2026. At the time the inventory and appraisal was filed, the change of ownership statement with the county recorder or assessor in each county where the decedent owned real property at the time of death, as provided in section 480 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, was filed.

There is no Petition for Final Distribution on file with the Court.

A Status Report on Administration by Personal Representative of the Estate was filed on July 17, 2026. Petitioner requests an additional six months to complete and file the final petition due to delays obtaining necessary bank records and communicating with other heirs/beneficiaries.

TENTATIVE RULING #1: APPEARANCES ARE REQUIRED AT 8:30 A.M. ON MONDAY, AUGUST 3, 2026, IN DEPARTMENT NINE. A STATUS OF ADMINISTRATION HEARING IS SET FOR 8:30 A.M. ON MONDAY, AUGUST 2, 2027, IN DEPARTMENT NINE. PETITIONER OR COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PERSONALLY APPEAR, OR FILE A STATUS UPDATE WITH THE COURT AT LEAST TWO WEEKS BEFORE THAT HEARING. IF A PARTY OR PARTIES WISH TO APPEAR BY ZOOM, PLEASE CONTACT THE COURT AT (530) 621-5867 AND MEETING INFORMATION WILL BE PROVIDED.

1

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share