DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV014900·sacramento·Civil·Case Management Conference
Hearing 28 days agoThe Case Management Conference has been continued to allow time for the Demurrer.

HAGEN, et al. vs FCA US LLC, et al.

Initial Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Jul 22, 2026
Department
16D
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Mar 5, 2027
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffHAGEN
DefendantFCA US LLC

Ruling

25CV014900: HAGEN, et al. vs FCA US LLC, et al. 07/22/2026 Initial Case Management Conference in Department 16D

Tentative Ruling

Notices:

Parties who wish to contest the tentative ruling below must: (1) request a hearing by calling the Department 16D Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874-3056 no later than 4:00 p.m. on the Court day before the scheduled CMC, and (2) advise opposing counsel of the request. If a hearing is not requested by 4:00 p.m. on the Court day before the scheduled CMC, the tentative ruling shall become the final order of the Court.

If a hearing is requested, the Court assumes that all parties will appear remotely via Zoom unless the Court orders in-person attendance. The Department 16D Zoom Link is https://saccourt-cagov.zoomgov.com/j/16146506749 and the Zoom Meeting ID is 161 4650 6749. To appear telephonically via Zoom, call (833) 568-8864 and enter the Department 16D Zoom ID referenced above.

No appearance is required under the following conditions:

The Case Management Conference has been continued to allow time for the Demurrer.

Case Management Conference is scheduled for 03/05/2027 at 1:30 PM in Department 16D at Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye Courthouse.

New Case Management Statements shall be filed by all parties no later than 15 days prior to the hearing pursuant to Local Rule 2.51.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share