DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV002343·sacramento·Civil·Case Management
Hearing over 1 year agoReferred to Trial Setting Process

KIPPER vs NATURA MANAGEMENT, LLC DBA NATURA

Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Dec 27, 2024
Department
38
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffKIPPER
DefendantNATURA MANAGEMENT, LLC DBA NATURA

Ruling

24CV002343: KIPPER vs NATURA MANAGEMENT, LLC DBA NATURA 12/27/2024 Case Management Conference in Department 38

Tentative Ruling

Notices: Any party who wishes to contest the tentative ruling below must: (1) request a hearing by calling the clerk in Department 38 at (916) 874-5226 no later than 4:00 p.m. on the Court day before the scheduled CMC, and (2) advise opposing counsel of the request. If a hearing is not requested by 4:00 p.m. on the Court day before the scheduled CMC, the tentative ruling will become the final order of the Court.

If a hearing is requested, the Court assumes that all parties will appear remotely via Zoom unless the Court orders in-person attendance. The Department 38 Zoom ID is: 161 0836 2593. To appear telephonically via Zoom, call (833) 568-8864 and enter the Department 38 Zoom ID referenced above.

Court’s Tentative Ruling:

No appearance is required under the following conditions:

This case is referred to Trial Setting Process for selection of Trial and Mandatory Settlement Conference dates. All counsel (including parties appearing in pro per) shall confer and agree upon trial and settlement conference dates. Available dates can be obtained on the court's web site at http://www.saccourt.ca.gov. Plaintiff's counsel must notify the court of the selection of Mandatory Settlement Conference and Trial dates no later than 60 days after 12/27/2024, by completing the request form at http://www.saccourt.ca.gov/civil/trial-setting.aspx. If the parties have not agreed on dates before the 60th day, court staff shall assign Mandatory Settlement Conference and Trial dates that are next available, unless an extension of time has been granted by the appropriate Case Management Program Judge.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share