DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25NWLC15321·la·Civil·Debt Collection
Hearing todayGRANTED

CITIBANK, N.A. vs NEREIDA DELACRUZ

Motion to Compel Arbitration

Hearing date
Aug 18, 2026
Department
Y
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Mar 3, 2027

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCitibank, N.A.
DefendantNereida Delacruz

Ruling

default judgment entered against him on or about April 3, 2026 when he contested the wage garnishment in Court.

Here, the Court finds that Defendant has rebutted the presumption of service. Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Sec. 473(d), the Court may set aside any void judgment or order. A motion pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Sec. 473(d) can be brought at any time after judgment. In California Capital Insurance Company v. Hoehn (2024) 17 Cal.5th 207, the California Supreme Court ruled that a motion to vacate a void judgment due to improper service of process under Code of Civil Procedure Sec. 473(d) is not subject to an arbitrary two-year time limit.

The Court also finds that Defendant had no actual notice. "Actual notice," within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure Sec. 473.5, means genuine knowledge by the defendant, and has been strictly construed. Relief under the statute is liberally granted to defendants so that cases may be resolved on their merits. Ellard v. Conway (2001) 94 Cal.App.4th 540, 547-548. Code of Civil Procedure Sec. 128 also grants jurisdiction to the Court to take appropriate action in the interests of justice.

The Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion and vacates and sets aside the Clerk's Entry of Default on March 25, 2025 and Default Judgment on April 15, 2025. The Court also vacates and sets aside the Writ of Execution issued on August 20, 2025. Defendant has submitted a proposed Answer with his Motion. The Court will deem that Answer filed.

The Court further ORDERS that if any wages that have been garnished are being held by the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Office, such amounts are to be returned to Defendant Michael Johnson (the alleged debtor). To the extent any garnished amounts have been sent to Plaintiff (the creditor), Plaintiff should return such amounts to Michael Johnson and/or his counsel forthwith. The Court sets trial in this action on May 13, 2027 at 8:30 a.m. in Department Y of the Norwalk Courthouse. Defendant to give notice.

NEREIDA DELACRUZ Tentative Ruling: The Court has read and considered the moving papers filed by Defendant Nereida Delacruz ("Defendant"), including her supporting declaration. No opposition was filed by Plaintiff Citibank, N.A. ("Plaintiff"). The Court takes judicial notice of the Complaint filed on March 26, 2025 and the attached Cardmember Agreement. Defendant also submitted the Cardmember Agreement with her moving papers.

Code of Civil Procedure section 1281.2 provides that a court shall order arbitration if it determines that an agreement to arbitrate exists and that a party to the agreement refuses to arbitrate. Once arbitration is compelled, the court must stay the action pending the outcome of the arbitration pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1281.4.

The Court notes that Defendant has elected to resolve Plaintiff's claims by binding arbitration and has made this request to Plaintiff by filing this motion pursuant to the terms of the Cardmember Agreement. Defendant has also advised that she submitted this matter to arbitration with American Arbitration Association (AAA) on July 21, 2026.

Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 1281.2 and 1281.4, Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration is GRANTED. The proceedings are stayed pending arbitration with AAA. The Court advances and vacates the current trial date of August 19, 2026. The Court sets a Status Conference re Status of Arbitration on March 3, 2027 at 8:30 a.m. in Department Y. Plaintiff to give notice.

Case Number: 25NWLC35182 Hearing Date: August 18, 2026 Dept: Y 25NWLC35182: CAPITAL ONE N.A. vs ARASELY CASTRO Tentative Ruling: The Court has read and considered the moving papers filed by Plaintiff Capital One, N.A. ("Plaintiff"), including the supporting declaration. The Court takes judicial notice of the Stipulation Agreement; Jurisdiction Retained Under Code of Civil Procedure Section 664.6 signed by Defendant on October 15, 2025 and filed with the Court on December 9, 2025. The Court also takes judicial notice of the Order on Settlement Agreement and

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share