In the Matter of Narek and Ruzan
Petition
Motion type
Monetary amounts referenced
Ruling
/// /// /// V. CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing, the Court DENIES CR&R's Motion for Sanctions. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: August 18, 2026 Hon. Michael R. Amerian Judge, Superior Court | [1] All statutory references are to California codes unless stated otherwise.
discrepancies in the Petitions before it. As to Narek: Proposed Order Item 8(a)(2): Lists medical payments as $1,205.81.00 but lacks receipts to prove same. Proposed Order Item 8(a)(3): Lists medical payments as $1,162.86, but no receipts are provided to show same. Proposed Order Item 8(a)(3): Lists medical payments as $1,162.86, but on Petition item 13, the same amount is listed under "other than medical expenses" category. Petition provides a chiropractor receipt for $2,020.00, but that amount is not directly represented in the Proposed Order.
As to Ruzan: Proposed Order Item 8(a)(3): Lists medical payments as $1,273.25, but the listed providers total $1,590.00. (600+990) Proposed Order Item 8(a)(5): Lists total fees and expenses as $2,455.81, but the correct total is $4,045.81. Petition Item 13(a): Requests $1,250.00 in attorney's fees, but attorney declaration not attached. | Home -->)" -->
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”