DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24STCV17156·la·Civil·Discovery
Hearing todayDENIED

LA Forward Institute, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al.

Motion to Compel Production in Accordance With statement of Compliance

Hearing date
Aug 18, 2026
Department
513
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffLA Forward Institute
DefendantCity of Los Angeles

Ruling

(Stanley Mosk Courthouse: Dept. 513) August 18, 2026 DEPARTMENT 513 LAW AND MOTION RULINGS

Court of California County of Los Angeles - Central District Department 513 LA Forward Institute, et al.; Plaintiffs, vs. City of Los Angeles, et al., Defendants. | Case No.: |

| | | Hearing Date: | August 18, 2026 | | | Time: | 10:00 a.m. | | | [Tentative] Order RE: Motion to Compel Production in Accordance With statement of Compliance | MOVING PARTY: Defendant City of Los Angeles RESPONDING PARTY: Plaintiff LA Forward Institute Motion to Compel

Production in Accordance With Statement of Compliance The court considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers filed in connection with this motion. DISCUSSION Defendant the City of Los Angeles ("Defendant") moves the court for an order compelling plaintiff LA Forward Institute ("Plaintiff") to produce documents in accordance with a statement of compliance to Defendant's Requests for Production, Set One. The court denies the motion because the basis for the motion is Defendant's contention that Plaintiff produced redacted documents subject to a claim of attorney-client privilege that Defendant contends is without merit.

This is not the proper subject of a motion to compel compliance under Code of Civil Procedure section 2031.320. ORDER The court DENIES defendant the City of Los Angeles's motion to compel compliance. The court orders defendant the City of Los Angeles to give notice of this ruling. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: August 18, 2026 _____________________________ Robert B. Broadbelt III Judge of the Superior Court Case Number: 24STCV25536 Hearing Date: August 18, 2026 Dept: 513 Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles - Central District Department 513 Victor Palumbo, et al.; Plaintiffs, vs.

The Den Editorial, LLC, et al., Defendants. | Case No.: | 24STCV25536 | | | Hearing Date:

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share