Tesseract, Inc. v. EDS Supply Chain, Inc.

Court ("Informal Discovery Conference" or "IDC"). Lead or other designated counsel for the parties with full authority are ordered to participate in person in an IDC. After consulting with opposing counsel regarding available dates, CAG must make a prompt reservation for the IDC using the Court's online reservation system. CAG must file Dept. 508's one-page IDC form in the department seven days prior to the IDC, and the responding parties may file the same form in the department setting forth a response three days prior to the IDC.

Once CAG confirms an IDC date, CAG must use the Court's online reservation system to continue the motion to a post-IDC discovery hearing date. The parties are ordered to have with them whatever materials are needed to make the IDC session productive and successful. Prior to the IDC date, lead or other designated counsel for the parties, with full authority, are to meet and confer, in person or via telephone in a further attempt to resolve as many of the issues as possible before the IDC. (See Cal.

Rules of Court, rule 3.670(f)(2).) If the parties resolve their discovery disputes before the IDC date, CAG is ordered to take both the IDC and the motion off calendar as soon as possible. CAG is ordered to give notice of this Order. DATED: August 18, 2026 ________________________________ Hon. Teresa A. Beaudet Judge, Los Angeles Superior Court

Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles Department 508 TESSERACT, INC., Plaintiff, vs. EDS SUPPLY CHAIN, INC., Defendant. | Case No.: |

| Hearing Date: | August 18, 2026 |

Hearing Time: | 8:30 a.m. | [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT | Background Plaintiff Tesseract, Inc. ("Plaintiff") appears to request entry of default judgment against Defendant EDS Supply Chain, Inc., in the total amount of $568,158.20, comprising $564,108.20 demanded in the complaint, $1,875.00 in costs, and $2,175.00 in attorney fees. Although Plaintiff requested entry of default multiple times, Plaintiff's requests have been unsuccessful. Based on the foregoing, the Court denies Plaintiff's request for default judgment without prejudice.

The Court cannot review a default judgment package without Plaintiff first obtaining entry of default. Plaintiff is ordered to resubmit the request for entry of default by _________. Within ______ days of the entry of default, Plaintiff is ordered to file a new default judgment package. The hearing on the default judgment package is set on _____________, 2026 at 10:00 a.m. in Dept. 508. Courtesy copies of the default judgment package must be delivered to Dept. 508 concurrently with filing. DATED: August 18, 2026 ________________________________ Hon.

Teresa A. Beaudet Judge, Los Angeles Superior Court Case Number: 25STCV34749 Hearing Date: August 18, 2026 Dept: 508 Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles Department 508 SHAUN PETERSON, Plaintiff, vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. | Case No.: |