DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
PP20200225·eldorado·Civil·Letters of Administration
Hearing 5 months agoCONTINUED

ESTATE OF ROBERT THARRAT

Letters of Administration

Hearing date
Mar 16, 2026
Department
9
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
May 11, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerEstate of Joaquin Diaz

Ruling

March 16, 2026 Dept. 9 Probate Tentative Rulings

11. PP20200225 ESTATE OF ROBERT THARRAT Letters of Administration

Decedent Tharrat’s estate is named in a federal personal injury lawsuit brought by the representative of the Estate of Joaquin Diaz (“Petitioner”). Decedent’s estate was named in the lawsuit as of August 31, 2021, and decedent’s estate filed an Answer on January 27, 2025.

Decedent’s estate has a Special Administrator who was appointed for the sole purpose of filing a claim on behalf of decedent with the September 11 Victim Compensation Fund.

Petitioner attempted to file a late creditor claim in this probate matter in an unspecified amount, reflecting a potential award of damages in the federal lawsuit. This claim was later withdrawn because the claim was filed too late, the Special Administrator had no authority to pay decedent’s debts, and the Petitioner had no legal claim against the personal representative. See, Tentative Ruling, December 1, 2025.

Now Petitioner has filed a Petition to administer decedent’ estate. However, there is no proof of publication, Duties/Liabilities statement (DE 147/DE 147s) or proof of service of notice of the hearing on the Petition on file with the Court.

TENTATIVE RULING #11: THIS MATTER IS CONTINUED TO 8:30 A.M. ON MONDAY, MAY 11, 2026, IN DEPARTMENT NINE TO ALLOW PETITIONER TIME TO FILE A DUTIES/LIABILITY STATEMENT, PROOF OF PUBLICATION AND PROOF OF SERVICE WITH THE COURT.

13

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share