DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24FL0279·eldorado·Civil·Child Custody
Hearing 3 months agoDropped from calendar.

COUNTY OF EL DORADO DCSS V. NATHAN SPROULE

Modification of child custody and parenting plan

Hearing date
Jun 4, 2026
Department
5
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCOUNTY OF EL DORADO DCSS
DefendantNATHAN SPROULE
OtherJAYCEE BERGESON

Ruling

LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 June 4, 2026 8:30 a.m./1:30 p.m.

15. COUNTY OF EL DORADO DCSS V. NATHAN SPROULE (OTHER PARENT: JAYCEE BERGESON) 24FL0279

Respondent filed a Request for Order (RFO) on March 9, 2026, seeking modification of the current child custody and parenting plan orders. The parties were referred to Child Custody Recommending Counseling (CCRC) with an appointment on April 8, 2026 and a review hearing on June 4, 2026. Proof of Service shows Other Parent was served with some, but not all the required documents on March 13, 2026. There is no Proof of Service showing Petitioner was properly served.

Only Respondent appeared at the CCRC appointment on April 8, 2026. As such, a single parent report with no agreements or recommendations was filed with the court on May 19, 2026. Copies were mailed to the parties on May 21st.

The court drops the matter from calendar due to the lack of proper service. All prior orders remain in full force and effect.

TENTATIVE RULING #15: THE MATTER IS DROPPED FROM CALENDAR DUE TO THE LACK OF PROPER SERVICE. ALL PRIOR ORDERS REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.

NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share