DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24FL1287·eldorado·Civil·Spousal Support
Hearing 2 months agoRFO rendered moot; dropped from calendar.

Amanda Kirkland v. Crystal Sandy-Kirkland

Request for Order for modification of spousal support

Hearing date
Jun 18, 2026
Department
5
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffAmanda Kirkland
DefendantCrystal Sandy-Kirkland

Ruling

LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 June 18, 2026 8:30 a.m./1:30 p.m.

16. AMANDA KIRKLAND V. CRYSTAL SANDY-KIRKLAND 24FL1287

Petitioner filed a Request for Order (RFO) on April 7, 2026, requesting modification of spousal support orders. Petitioner concurrently filed an Income and Expense Declaration. Respondent was served on April 7, 2026.

Respondent filed a Responsive Declaration and Income and Expense Declaration on May 11, 2026. There is no Proof of Service for these documents, therefore, the court cannot consider them.

Parties filed a stipulation and order with the court regarding termination of spousal support, which the court adopted as its order on June 8, 2026.

On June 9, 2026, parties filed a second stipulation and order, which also addressed the spousal support issue. The court signed and adopted the stipulation as its order on June 9th.

The court finds the parties’ stipulations have rendered the RFO moot. As such, the court drops the RFO from calendar.

All prior orders remain in full force and effect.

TENTATIVE RULING #16: THE COURT FINDS THE PARTIES’ STIPULATIONS HAVE RENDERED THE RFO MOOT. AS SUCH, THE COURT DROPS THE RFO FROM CALENDAR. ALL PRIOR ORDERS REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.

NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share