DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CU0002698·nevada·Civil·Civil
Hearing about 2 months agoJury trial set

Kayla DiPietro, et al. vs. Johnathan Husak

Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Jun 22, 2026
Department
6
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffKayla DiPietro
DefendantJohnathan Husak

Ruling

8. CU0002076 Vicki L Briggs v. Sierra Nevada Memorial Hospital, et al. Appearances are required. Vicki L. Briggs shall show cause why she should not be sanctioned, or this matter dismissed, for failing to file a proof of service, an application for service by publication, or a request for dismissal as previously ordered on August 11, 2025.

9. CU0002198 Makenna Cavanaugh vs. Cascade Shores Home Owners Assoc. No appearances are required. A request for dismissal with prejudice has been filed. This case is dismissed with prejudice.

10. CU0002217 Brooklyn Russell vs. Terry Ann Ferguson As Trustee Of The Terry Ann Ferguson Living Trust Appearances are required for status regarding dismissal. If the parties wish the court to retain jurisdiction, they should file a written stipulation under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 or state their agreement regarding the same on the record.

11. CU0002507 Raymond Ray Thompson, et al. vs. Jacqueline Lucero No appearances are required. On its own motion, the Court continues the case management conference to October 5, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file a proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of Defendant Antonio Lucero no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference date.

12. CU0002555 Maria Aplington vs. Miguel M. O'Brien No appearances are required. On its own motion, the Court continues the case management conference to October 5, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file a proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of Defendant no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference date.

13. CU0002556 National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2005-1 vs. Morgan Nettles, et al. No appearances are required. A request for dismissal with prejudice has been filed. This case is dismissed with prejudice.

14. CU0002696 Carrie Wyss vs. Sierra Academy of Expeditionary Learning No appearances are required. This case is at issue. Jury fees are unpaid.

Trial is hereby set as follows: 7-day nonjury trial. Trial: June 15, 2027, 9:00 a.m., Dept.

6. PTC: June 4, 2027, 11:00 a.m., Dept.

6. MSC: May 10, 2027, 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6.

15. CU0002698 Kayla DiPietro, et al. vs. Johnathan Husak No appearances are required. This case is at issue. Jury fees are paid.

Trial is hereby set as follows: 7-day jury trial.

Trial: June 15, 2027, 9:00 a.m., Dept.

6. PTC: June 4, 2027, 11:00 a.m., Dept.

6. MSC: May 17, 2027, 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6.

16. CU0002700 LVNV Funding LLC vs. Jared Acosta No appearances are required. On its own motion, the Court continues the case management conference to October 5, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file a proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of Defendant no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference date.

17. CU0002707 William L. Wallace vs. Lilli Ingrasci No appearances are required. This case is at issue. Jury fees are unpaid. The Court notes Defendant has failed to timely file a case management conference statement that would alert the Court to unavailable dates. Additionally, Plaintiff’s case management conference statement did not include the referenced attachment of unavailable dates. Accordingly, the Court sets dates as follows:

Trial is hereby set as follows: 7-day nonjury trial. Trial: June 8, 2027, 9:00 a.m., Dept.

6. PTC: May 28, 2027, 11:00 a.m., Dept.

6. MSC: May 10, 2027, 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share