DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
PFL20200677·eldorado·Civil·Family Law
Hearing 5 months agoTHE PARTIES ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR FOR THE HEARING ON ALL ISSUES.

AMANDA ALESSANDRO V. JEREMY ALESSANDRO

Request for Order (RFO) regarding division of community property; Five-year dismissal hearing

Hearing date
Mar 26, 2026
Department
5
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffAMANDA ALESSANDRO
DefendantJEREMY ALESSANDRO

Ruling

LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 March 26, 2026 8:30 a.m./1:30 p.m.

1. AMANDA ALESSANDRO V. JEREMY ALESSANDRO PFL20200677

On December 23, 2025, Respondent filed a Request for Order (RFO) seeking an order regarding the division of community property. He filed his Income and Expense Declaration concurrently therewith. The RFO, the Income and Expense Declaration and the Notice of Tentative Ruling were personally served on Petitioner the same day as filing.

A hearing on the RFO was scheduled to take place on the present date. Additionally, this matter was scheduled for a five-year dismissal hearing on January 16, 2026. No one appeared at the hearing. The court noted the pending RFO hearing and continued the fiveyear dismissal hearing to join with the hearing on the RFO.

Petitioner filed her Responsive Declaration to Request for Order on February 17, 2026. It was served on the 16th. She did not file an Income and Expense Declaration.

Respondent filed and served a Supplemental Declaration on March 19th. The court deems this to be a Reply Declaration.

The parties are ordered to appear for the hearing on all issues.

TENTATIVE RULING #1: THE PARTIES ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR FOR THE HEARING ON ALL ISSUES.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share