All cases
WELLS FARGO BANK VS BALTAZAR
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COMPLAINT FOR COLLECTIONS BY WELLS FARGO BANK
Hearing date
Aug 14, 2026
Department
C1
Judge
—
Prevailing
Moving Party
Motion type
Causes of action
Parties
PlaintiffWELLS FARGO BANK
DefendantBALTAZAR
Ruling
1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO VACATE DISMISSAL 664.6 AND CITIBANK VS CVCO2502762 ENTRY JUDGMENT UNDER TERMS OF BEHRENS STIPULATION SETTLEMENT BY CITIBANK Tentative Ruling: Motion granted
2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON WELLS FARGO BANK CVCO2601055 COMPLAINT FOR COLLECTIONS BY WELLS VS BALTAZAR FARGO BANK Tentative Ruling: Motion granted
Cited authorities
Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.