Mauricio Varela v. Svetlana Gogolitsyn
Request for Order for Change of Child Custody, Visitation
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4
5) 6 MAURICIO VARELA,) Case Number: FLD-25-397265) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: August 18, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 SVETLANA GOGOLITSYN,) Department: 404) 10 Respondent) Presiding: AI MORI) 11) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTODY, VISITATION 13 (PARENTING TIME) 14 TENTATIVE RULING 15 Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the 16 Court makes the following findings and orders: 17 A. Procedural History 18 1) Petitioner Mauricio Varela (Father) and Respondent Svetlana Gogolitsyn (Mother) have one 19 minor child together, Mars (DOB 2/19/2014, age 12).
Father suffered a severe traumatic brain 20 injury in 2016 and is under a conservatorship. In an order filed 2/21/2025, the juvenile court 21 awarded sole legal and physical custody to Father “on the condition that either the paternal 22 grandmother, Vanessa Carias, or the paternal uncle, Marco Meza, is present with the minor at all 23 times.” The juvenile court suspended Mother's visits after making a detriment finding and ordered 24 that Mother may attempt to rebut the detriment finding and resume visits “on the condition that 25 she engage in individual therapy for 6 months, complete a substance use assessment, and 26 complete a parenting class.” 27 2) On for hearing is Mother's request for joint legal and physical custody with parenting time for 28 Mother on Wednesday, Thursday and Fridays, and Sundays, Thanksgiving holiday and school 29 break, Christmas and winter break, Mother's Day, Mother's birthday (9/22), and Mars's birthday
1 (2/19). She states she engaged in therapy from February to April 2025, completed a substance 2 abuse assessment during the dependency case, completed a parenting class, resumed weekly 3 individual therapy in March 2026, and is seeing a psychiatrist. She states she is employed as a 4 shopper for Instacart. She states the paternal grandmother and uncle have been supportive of her 5 effort to maintain contact with Mars and that she has visited Mars regularly, with the grandmother 6 and/or uncle present, since January 2026 for between 3 and 7 hours per visit. 7 3) Paternal grandmother Vanessa Carias (Grandmother) filed a declaration in which she states that 8 Mother has not completed an alcohol abuse treatment program and there is no evidence, such as a 9 psychological evaluation or a letter from a treating physician, that she no longer suffers from 10 mental illness or that she can safely parent Mars without supervision.
She states that during visits, 11 Mother talks to herself and carries on conversations with individuals who are not present, as she 12 has done over the years Grandmother has known Mother. Grandmother states that during some 13 visits, Mother has spent 20 minutes with Mars before sleeping on the couch for 3 hours, and Mars 14 would say, "Oh my God, she's doing it again, she's talking to herself," and would ask when she 15 was leaving. Mother also tells Mars that she is taking him to Florida and has shown up to his 16 school multiple times and has tried to remove him from school.
Grandmother expresses concern 17 about Mother's severely cluttered home and the fact that she states she is employed by Instacart 18 when she stated during recent child support proceedings that she is not employed. Grandmother 19 attaches various CPS and dependency court documents to her declaration and sets forth the case 20 history, including Mother's sister's suicide in Mother and Mars's home (Mars saw his aunt's dead 21 body), sexual abuse concerns, and Mother's threats to kill herself and Mars. 22 4) Paternal uncle Marco Meza (Uncle) has filed a declaration in which he states that he agreed to 23 supervise visits for Mother after she showed up at Mars's middle school unannounced.
He states 24 that during visits, Mother continues to talk to herself and to others who are not there, sometimes 25 spends a significant amount of time on her cell phone instead of trying to rebuild her relationship 26 with Mars, and repeatedly pressures Mars to return home with her. Uncle states that Mars is doing 27 well and has been happy since moving in with him and Grandmother and that it is best for his 28 stability and wellbeing to have limited supervised visits with Mother. 29
1 5) The parties attended mediation and were unable to reach an agreement. Grandmother and Uncle 2 requested supervised visits through Rally Family Visitation Center or facilitated by them. Mother 3 requested visits on Fridays from 4pm and Sundays from 10pm. 4 B. Findings and Orders 5 1) This Court has jurisdiction to make child custody orders in this case under the Uniform Child 6 Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act. A violation of this order may subject the party in 7 violation to civil or criminal penalties, or both.
The country of habitual residence of the minor 8 child is the United States. 9 2) The Court finds it is in Mars's best interest for Father to continue to have sole legal and physical 10 custody of Mars, with Grandmother or Uncle present. Beginning immediately, Mother shall have 11 one, 2-hour visit per week with Mars, supervised by Grandmother or Uncle, with the day and 12 time of the visit to be arranged for by the parties. If the parties are unable to reach an agreement 13 regarding the day or time of the visit, the visits shall take place every Friday from 5pm to 7pm. 14 3) All orders not in conflict with these orders shall remain in full force and effect. 15 4) The Court will prepare the Findings and Order After Hearing. 16
20
24
28
29
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”