DOUGLAS WILSON, AS RECEIVER FOR PARKMERCED OWNER, VS. LAURA RODRIGUEZ ET AL
DEMURRER to COMPLAINT
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26682938 - August 17, 2026 Hearing date: August 17, 2026 Case number: CUD26682938 Case title: DOUGLAS WILSON, AS RECEIVER FOR PARKMERCED OWNER, VS. LAURA RODRIGUEZ ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26682938 | Case Title: | | DOUGLAS WILSON, AS RECEIVER FOR PARKMERCED OWNER, VS. LAURA RODRIGUEZ ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-08-17 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for August 17, 2026.
Line 14. DEFENDANT Rodriguez and Cocon's Demurrer to Complaint is OVERRULED, 5 days to answer from notice of entry of order. The Complaint is not uncertain.=(501/SKF) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”