DOUGLAS WILSON VS. KEISHA T. GARRETT ET AL
MOTION FOR SET ASIDE/VACATE JUDGMENT
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25680382 - August 18, 2026 Hearing date: August 18, 2026 Case number: CUD25680382 Case title: DOUGLAS WILSON VS. KEISHA T. GARRETT ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25680382 | Case Title: | | DOUGLAS WILSON VS. KEISHA T. GARRETT ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-08-18 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SET ASIDE/VACATE JUDGMENT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for August 18, 2026. Line 6.
Defendants' Motion for Set Aside Judgment for Breach of Stipulated Settlement (CCP 473(b)) is DENIED.
According to Defendants' moving papers, Defendants request not only that the Court set aside the June 16, 2026 judgment in Plaintiff's favor-which has apparently since been satisfied-but also to enter a different judgment in Defendants' favor. This request is not authorized by CCP 473(b), which authorizes only relief from an adverse judgment, order, or proceeding taken against the moving party, not affirmative relief in the moving party's favor. Moreover, the moving papers are not accompanied by a copy of any proposed responsive filing: the declaration of defense counsel filed in support of this motion refers to an Exhibit A which is not attached.=(501/SKF)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”