DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24614770·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing 1 day agoGRANTED

HERRINGBONE TAVERN, INC. VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL

MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS OF CASE(S) CGC-24-614952 WITH CASE CGC-24-614770

Hearing date
Aug 17, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffHERRINGBONE TAVERN, INC.
DefendantCITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24614770 - August 17, 2026 Hearing date: August 17, 2026 Case number: CGC24614770 Case title: HERRINGBONE TAVERN, INC. VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24614770 | Case Title: | | HERRINGBONE TAVERN, INC. VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-08-17 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS OF CASE(S) CGC-24-614952 WITH CASE CGC-24-614770 | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for August 17, 2026. Line 3.

Defendant's Stipulated Motion to Consolidate CGC-24-614952 and CGC-24-614770 is GRANTED. No opposition filed. Actions shall be consolidated for all purposes. Case CGC-24-614770 shall be the lead case. Trial date of December 7, 2026 in case CGC-24-614952 is vacated. The consolidated matter shall be set on the case management track. =(501/SKF)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share