DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CPF26519560·sf·Civil·Asset Forfeiture
Hearing 1 day agoGRANTED

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS. PROPERTY SUBJECT TO DISPOSITION; $4,361.00 U.S. ET AL

Motion For Order That Requests For Admissions Set No. One Be Deemed Admitted

Hearing date
Aug 17, 2026
Department
302
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$4,361.00

Parties

PlaintiffPeople of the State of California
DefendantChristy Neasley

Attorneys

Victoria Robinsonfor Plaintiff
Maite Anastasiofor Plaintiff

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 302 - CPF26519560 - August 17, 2026 Hearing date: August 17, 2026 Case number: CPF26519560 Case title: PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS. PROPERTY SUBJECT TO DISPOSITION; $4,361.00 U.S. ET AL Case Number: | | CPF26519560 | Case Title: | | PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS. PROPERTY SUBJECT TO DISPOSITION; $4,361.00 U.S. ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-08-17 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order That Requests For Admissions Set No. One Be Deemed Admitted; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities; Declarations Of Victoria Robinson And Maite Anastasio In Support Thereof; Exhibits; [Proposed Order] | Rulings: | | Matter on calendar for Monday, August 17, 2026, Line 2, PETITIONER PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA's Motion For Order That Requests For Admissions Set No. One Be Deemed Admitted.

People of the State of California's motion that Claimant Christy Neasley be deemed to admit set one requests for admission is granted. The People have shown that Neasley was served with the requests for admission and, although the time has passed to do so, Neasley has not served any responses to the requests. No opposition filed.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/HEK). | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share