DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC26635712·sf·Civil·Civil
Hearing 1 day agoGRANTED

JOSEPH YOOJONG KIM VS. AMAZON.COM, INC. ET AL

MOTION TO ADMIT COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE

Hearing date
Aug 17, 2026
Department
302
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJOSEPH YOOJONG KIM
DefendantAMAZON.COM, INC.
DefendantANCHOR HOCKING, LLC

Attorneys

James Phillipsfor Defendant

Ruling

Matter on calendar for Monday, August 17, 2026, Line 10, DEFENDANT ANCHOR HOCKING, LLC's MOTION TO ADMIT COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE.

2 - Defendant Anchor Hocking, LLC's application to admit James Phillips pro hac vice is granted. Good cause shown and no opposition filed. The court will sign the previously submitted proposed order.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/HEK). | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share