DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
20CV00443·santacruz·Civil·Writ of Mandate
Hearing 1 day agoDemurrers sustained without leave to amend; Motions to strike granted

STEINBRUNER v. COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, et al.

County Respondents’ Demurrer and Motion to Strike Petitioner’s Second Amended Petition for Writ of Mandate; Real Party in Interest Cal Fire’s Demurrer and Motion to Strike Petitioner’s Second Amended Petition for Writ of Mandate

Hearing date
Aug 17, 2026
Department
Judge
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerSteinbruner
RespondentCounty of Santa Cruz
Real Party in InterestCal Fire

Ruling

LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: AUGUST 17, 2026 TIME: 8:30 A.M.

No. 20CV00443

STEINBRUNER v. COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, et al.

COUNTY RESPONDENTS’ DEMURRER AND MOTION TO STRIKE PETITIONER’S SECOND AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE

REAL PARTY IN INTEREST CAL FIRE’S DEMURRER AND MOTION TO STRIKE PETITIONER’S SECOND AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE

Both demurrers are sustained without leave to amend and the motions to strike are granted. Petitioner concedes that her second amended petition does not meet the requirements set forth in the Sixth District’s remittitur and there is no indication in the remittitur that further opportunities for amendment are permitted. (Steinbruner v. County of Santa Cruz (June 25, 2025, No. H051880).)

Petitioner’s Request for Judicial Notice in support of her opposition to CalFire’s motions:

1. Notice and moving papers: Denied, the court need not take judicial notice of its own record.

2. Order Sustaining County Respondents’ Demurrer to First Amended Petition: Denied, the court need not take judicial notice of its own record.

3. Public Resources Code § 4144 Implementation Guide, Cal. Department of Forestry and Fire Protection: Denied, immaterial to this ruling.

4. Correspondence, January 9, 2008, Cal Fire Labor CDF Firefighters to Santa Cruz County Fire Department Advisory Commission: Denied, immaterial to this ruling. Petitioner’s Request for Judicial Notice in support of her opposition to County’s motion is denied; all three documents are contained within the court record in this action.

County Respondents’ Request for Judicial Notice is denied as immaterial to this ruling.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share