DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
PR00001042·nevada·Probate·Probate
Hearing 8 days agoCONTINUED

In Re Vazquez Lizarraga, Carlo Alexandre

Petition

Hearing date
Aug 10, 2026
Department
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerCarlo Alexandre Vazquez Lizarraga

Ruling

avers he has not brought the motion for purposes of delay. Capdevielle Decl., ¶ 6. The Court finds counsel’s declaration in support of his motion to sufficiently set forth information which results in a finding Mr. Capdevielle can no longer effectively represent Mr. Mario Hernandez.

Accordingly, the motion is granted. Counsel shall provide a proposed order utilizing Judicial Council form MC-053 within five (5) days.

3. PR00001042 In Re Vazquez Lizarraga, Carlo Alexandre

Appearances required. The Court wishes to inquire of counsel for the proposed conservatee as to whether there is any objection to the Petition and to clarify powers requested.

2

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share