DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
FL0003056·nevada·Civil·Dissolution
Hearing 6 months agoCONTINUED

Huffman, Patti v. Harris, Nathan

Status Conference

Hearing date
Mar 6, 2026
Department
3
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 4, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerHuffman, Patti
RespondentHarris, Nathan

Ruling

STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION 03/06/2026, 9:00 a.m. Department 3

Case No. FL0003056 Petitioner: Huffman, Patti Attorney: Self-Represented Respondent: Harris, Nathan Attorney: Self-Represented

1. Status Conference is continued to 09/04/2026, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 09/01/2026.

2. The Court notes that the following are still required: a. Corrected FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner. Current FL-141 does not have complete information for the date and delivery method of the documents. b. Corrected FL-170 Declaration for Default or Uncontested Dissolution or Legal Separation (Family Law) c. Completed FL-180 Judgment (Family Law) d. Re-submit FL-190 Notice of Entry of Judgment (Family Law) with stamped addressed envelopes.

3. The corrected FL-141 shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 09/04/2026, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.

4. The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share