DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
FL0003034·nevada·Civil·Dissolution
Hearing 6 months agoCONTINUED

Blais, Melissa v. Blais, Donovan

Status Conference

Hearing date
Mar 6, 2026
Department
3
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 4, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerBlais, Melissa
RespondentBlais, Donovan

Ruling

STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION 03/06/2026, 9:00 a.m. Department 3

Case No. FL0003034 Petitioner: Blais, Melissa Attorney: Self-Represented Respondent: Blais, Donovan Attorney: Self-Represented

1. Status Conference is continued to 09/04/2026, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 09/01/2026.

2. The Court notes that the following are still required: a. Corrected FL-170 Declaration for Default or Uncontested Dissolution or Legal Separation (Family Law) Agreement was stated in FL-170, but not attached to FL-180. These must agree. b. Completed FL-180 Judgment (Family Law) Agreement was stated in FL- 170, but not attached to FL-180. These must agree. Also FL-192 Notice of Rights and Responsibilities Regarding Child Support must be attached to FL-180. c. Re-submit FL-190 Notice of Entry of Judgment (Family Law) with stamped addressed envelopes.

3. The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 09/04/2026, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.

4. The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.

__________________________________________________________________

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share