Singh Randhawa, Yugraj v. Smith, Keyione

judgment is to be entered in favor of the plaintiff and against defendant for the full balance of the account, plus costs according to a memorandum of costs including any motion and/or order fee(s) required by the court, less payments received in good funds before default. (Id.)

The parties signed the agreement, thereby satisfying CCP §664.6’s requirement that the settlement be in writing and signed by the parties. Plaintiff presents evidence that following execution of the settlement agreement, defendant paid a total of $883.51 with the last payment received on August 24, 2025. Plaintiff requests judgment be entered for the balance of $4,350.00, plus court costs in the amount of $603.61 pursuant to the memorandum of costs filed May 1, 2026, for a total judgment of $4,953.61. The defendant has not submitted an opposition.

Therefore, based on the record, plaintiff’s motion to set aside and vacate the dismissal and enforce settlement under CCP 664.6 is granted.

3. M-CV-0092172 Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Ramezani, Behrooz

Motion to deem admitted plaintiff’s requests for admissions, set one

Plaintiff moves to deem admitted plaintiff’s requests for admissions, set one.

Section 2033.280 of the California Code of Civil Procedure states “[i]f a party to whom requests for admission are directed fails to serve a timely response... (b) [t]he requesting party may move for an order that the genuineness of any documents and the truth of any matters specified in the requests be deemed admitted.”

Defendant did not file an opposition.

Plaintiff’s unopposed motion to deem admitted plaintiff’s requests for admissions, set one, is granted. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280 (b).) Defendant is deemed to have admitted the matters set forth in plaintiff’s requests for admissions, set one.

4. M-CV-0097943 Singh Randhawa, Yugraj v. Smith, Keyione

Application for Stay of Execution of Judgment

In this unlawful detainer matter, defendant Keyione Smith seeks a stay of execution of judgment through September 2, 2026. The court’s August 10, 2026 order granting the stay in part and scheduling this hearing required defendant Smith to deposit $653 with the clerk of the court for the fair daily rental value for a stay. The order specified, “If the required payment is not timely made, this order shall automatically expire.” A review of the court’s file reveals no such deposit has been made, so the August 10, 2026 order has expired by its own terms. Request for further stay is denied.

2