DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
T-CV-0002654·placer·Civil·Civil
Hearing 18 days agoDENIED (Defendant's motion); GRANTED (Plaintiff's motion)

HERLEY, JOHN v. SUGAR BOWL CORP

Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Pay Sanctions; Plaintiff’s request for sanctions

Hearing date
Jul 31, 2026
Department
1
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Sanctions rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$1,060.00

Parties

PlaintiffHERLEY, JOHN
DefendantSUGAR BOWL CORPORATION

Attorneys

Timothy Smithfor Defendant

Ruling

PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT FRIDAY, CIVIL LAW AND MOTION DEPARTMENT 1 COMMISSIONER CHRISTINE S. DEHR TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR JULY 31, 2026 AT 8:30 A.M.

24. T-CV-0002654 HERLEY, JOHN v. SUGAR BOWL CORP

NOTE: If oral argument is requested in this case, it shall be heard on JULY 31, 2026 AT 1:00 P.M. in DEPARTMENT 1.

Defendant Sugar Bowl Corporation’s Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Pay Sanctions

The motion is denied.

Plaintiff’s request for sanctions is granted. Monetary sanctions in the amount of $1,060.00 are imposed upon defendant Sugar Bowl Corporation and defendant’s counsel Timothy Smith, jointly and severally.

///

PLACER SUPERIOR COURT – DEPARTMENT 1 Friday Civil Law and Motion – Tentative Rulings

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share