DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26PB-0033507·shasta·Probate·Trust
Hearing 1 day agoCONTINUED

In re: Philip H. Greenlee Revocable Trust

Verified Petition for Determination of Ownership of Disputed Brokerage Account, Declaratory Relief, and Instructions to Trustee

Hearing date
Aug 17, 2026
Department
44
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Oct 12, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 26PB-0033507 This matter is on calendar for hearing on a Verified Petition for Determination of Ownership of Disputed Brokerage Account, Declaratory Relief, and Instructions to Trustee. The matter has not been properly noticed. The Petition seeks a determination of ownership of property. As such, the notice provisions of Probate Code Section 851 apply. Here, the Notice of Hearing fails to comply with Probate Code Section 851(c). Petitioner is required to use Mandatory Judicial Council Form DE-115 and 30 days notice is required.

Additionally, no summons has been served on any party claiming an interest in, or having possession of, the property in question as required by Probate Code Section 851. The matter is continued to Monday, October 12, 2026, at 2:30 p.m. in Department 44 for further proceedings on the Verified Petition for Determination of Ownership of Disputed Brokerage Account, Declaratory Relief, and Instructions to Trustee. Petitioner is required to file and serve a summons and Notice of Hearing on Petition to Determine Claim to Property for the continued hearing date, along with a copy of the Petition, on all parties entitled to notice.

No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

IN RE: ZANE FAMILY TRUST

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share