DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25PB-0032908·shasta·Probate·Estate
Hearing 1 day agoGRANTED

Estate of Rex Klein

Confirmation of filing the Inventory and Appraisal; Petition for Order Approving Sale of Real Property to Related Party; Status of Administration

Hearing date
Aug 17, 2026
Department
44
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Dec 21, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$250.00

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 25PB-0032908 This matter is on calendar for confirmation of filing the Inventory and Appraisal and further proceedings on the Petition for Order Approving Sale of Real Property to Related Party. The Court previously determined the matter to be properly noticed. No objections have been raised. The Final Inventory and Appraisal filed on July 23, 2026, is accepted by the Court. The paperwork appears to be in order. The Petition is GRANTED. A proposed Order was previously executed by the Court.

This matter is also on calendar for Status of Administration. A properly noticed Status Report has been filed which indicates additional time is required before the estate administration can be finalized. The matter is continued to Monday, December 21, 2026, at 2:30 p.m. in Department 44 for Status of Administration. If a Petition for Final Distribution cannot be filed prior to the next hearing, the Court ORDERS the Personal Representative to timely file and serve a Status Report with proper Notice of Hearing in compliance with Probate Code Section 12200 et seq. Failure to do so may result in the issuance of an Order to Show Cause Re: Monetary Sanctions of $250.00 for failure to timely close the estate administration and failure to comply with the Court’s order. If

a properly noticed Status Report or Petition for Final Distribution is noticed for a different date, the Court will vacate the December 21, 2026, date. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

ESTATE OF PATRICK MCDANIEL

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share