ALVARO VS PEAK FORECLOSURE SERVICES, INC.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. RE: PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ENJOINING DEFENDANTS FROM FORECLOSING ON PLAINTIFF’S PROPERTY
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME IIP-CA 2 LP VS ORR MOTION FOR PREJUDGMENT CVPS2303970 BUILDERS INTEREST BY IIP-CA 2 LP Tentative Ruling: Hearing continued to October 8, 2026 to be heard on same date/time as Motion for New Trial.
No further briefing will be permitted.
2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT OF TESS GOLDBERG BY GOLDENVOICE GOLDBERG VS CVPS2600022 LLC, ANSCHUTZ ENTERTAINMENT GOLDENVOICE LLC GROUP (AEG), PAUL TOLLETT, MELISSA ORMOND, JAY MARCIANO Tentative Ruling: Hearing continued to Wednesday, September 2nd 2026 at 8:30 a.m. in Department PS2.
No further briefing will be permitted.
The court notes Plaintiff’s late filed opposition.
3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME DEMURRER ON 2ND AMENDED COMPLAINT OF TESS GOLDBERG BY GOLDBERG VS GOLDENVOICE LLC, ANSCHUTZ CVPS2600022 GOLDENVOICE LLC ENTERTAINMENT GROUP (AEG), PAUL TOLLETT, MELISSA ORMOND, JAY MARCIANO Tentative Ruling: Hearing continued to Wednesday, September 2nd 2026 at 8:30 a.m. in Department PS2.
No further briefing will be permitted.
The court notes Plaintiff’s late filed opposition.
4. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION AND APPLICATION FOR: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. RE: ALVARO VS PEAK PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION CVPS2601662 FORECLOSURE ENJOINING DEFENDANTS FROM SERVICES, INC. FORECLOSING ON PLAINTIFF'S PROPERTY Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. Hearing will be conducted on Tuesday, August 18, 2026 at 8:30 a.m., Department PS2.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”