DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
PSC1802081·riverside·Probate·General Civil
Hearing todayCONTINUED

BELTRAN VS HARD ROCK HOTEL LICENSING INC

MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES

Hearing date
Aug 18, 2026
Department
PS1
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 22, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Attorney Fees rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSTEPHANIE BELTRAN
DefendantHARD ROCK HOTEL LICENSING INC

Ruling

The hearing on the demurrer is continued to 10.01.26. The parties are ordered to meet and confer via in person, teleconference or phone for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objections raised in the demurrer. As part of the meet and confer process, Defendant shall identify the specific causes of action that it believes are subject to demurrer and identify with legal support the basis of the deficiencies. Plaintiffs shall provide legal support for their position that the pleading is legally sufficient or, in the alternative, how the complaint may be amended to cure any legal insufficiency.

After meeting and conferring, the parties shall 10 days before the continued hearing date set above do one of the following: (1) Defendant vacate the hearing on the demurrer, and file an Answer; (2) The Parties file with the court a joint declaration stating the parties have agreed that Plaintiff will file an amended complaint before the date set forth above; or (3) The Parties file with the court a joint declaration stating the means by which the parties met and conferred and identifying the specific objections in the demurrer and supporting memorandum of points and authorities that the parties were unable to resolve. (CCP §430.41(a)(3), CCP §435.5(a)(3).)

The court will not accept further briefing. Failure to comply will result in sanctions.

6. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT OF MARKUS WELDON BY MICHAEL E. CVPS2604324 WELDON VS FIFE FIFE, AS TRUSTEE OF THE FIFE FAMILY TRUST, DATED MAY 13, 2008 Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. Hearing is continued to 10.01.26 for meet and confer purposes as noted above.

7. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME BELTRAN VS HARD ROCK PSC1802081 MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES HOTEL LICENSING INC Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. Hearing was continued to 9.22.26 to permit filing of sur-reply by Plaintiff Stephanie Beltran.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share