DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CVPS2603656·riverside·Probate·Civil Litigation
Hearing todayGRANTED

JAMES VS DESERT MOBILE HOMES LLC

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Aug 18, 2026
Department
PS1
Judge
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJAMES
DefendantDESERT MOBILE HOMES LLC

Ruling

cause of action for equitable indemnity as to Defendant Wesco.

6th Cause of Action Breach of Contract: The elements for a breach of contract claim are: (1) contract; (2) plaintiff’s performance; (3) breach; and (4) damages. (Wall Street Network, Ltd. v. N. Y. Times Co. (2008) 164 Cal.App.4th 1171, 1178.) The Complaint sufficiently states a cause of action for breach of contract against Defendant Wesco.

As to Defendant AmTrust for the 2nd, 3rd, 5th and 6th Causes of Action, Demurrer is SUSTAINED, with leave to amend. Plaintiff to file amended complaint within 15 days.

As to Defendant Wesco Insurance for the 2nd, 3rd, 5th and 6th Causes of Action, Demurrer is OVERRULED.

Case Management Conference continued to 11.24.26.

4. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME JAMES VS DESERT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND

MOBILE HOMES LLC AMENDED COMPLAINT Tentative Ruling: No opposition filed.

Motion for Leave to File 2nd Amended Complaint GRANTED.

The Proposed 2nd Amended Complaint attached as Exhibit A to Plaintiff’s Motion shall be deemed filed as of the date of this order.

Hearing on Anti-SLAPP motion as to the 1st Amended Complaint is confirmed for 9.23.26. It should be noted that Plaintiff filed his motion for leave to file an amended complaint on 7.14.26. The hearing for that motion was calendared for 8.18.26. On 8.10.26, Defendant filed a special motion to strike pursuant to CCP 425.16, with the hearing date for 9.23.26.

Thus, Plaintiff’s motion was not filed prior to the Anti-SLAPP motion and not subject to the restrictions of attempting to plead around a special motion. (JKC3H8 v. Colton, 221 Cal.App.4th 468, 477-478 (2013)).

5. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME DEMURRER ON COMPLAINT FOR WRONGFUL EVICTION AS TO FIRST AND SECOND CAUSES OF ACTION BY CVPS2604324 WELDON VS FIFE MICHAEL E. FIFE, AS TRUSTEE OF THE FIFE FAMILY TRUST, DATED MAY 13, 2008 Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share