DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CVRI2102535·riverside·Civil·Civil
Hearing 4 days agoOff Calendar

CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE vs MITCHELL

Motion for Leave to File Cross-Complaint

Hearing date
Aug 14, 2026
Department
4
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jun 9, 2027
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
DefendantMITCHELL

Ruling

1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME CITY OF LAKE MOTION LEAVE TO FILE CROSS-

ELSINORE vs MITCHELL COMPLAINT Tentative Ruling:

Motion is Off Calendar.

The Defendant has filed an appeal. The Court of Appeal has issued a Palma notice directing that the proceedings be Stayed pending determination of the appeal on the merits.

Matter is set for a Status Conference on June 9, 2027, at 8:30am, D-4.

2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND REQUEST FOR ADMISSION, SET CALDERON vs CITY OF TWO RESPONSE TO REQUESTS CVRI2303538 MENIFEE FOR ADMISSION, SET TWO, NO. 50 (ERRONEOUSLY NUMBERED 51) Tentative Ruling:

GRANT

The City has established an excusable mistake in its response to RFA2 No.50 and Plaintiff will not be unduly prejudiced by the amended response.

3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT’S FURTHER LAMBERT vs BMW OF CVRI2506588 RESPONSES TO SPECIAL NORTH AMERICA, LLC INTERROGATORIES NOS. 2, 4, 6, 7, 9, 11 AND 13; Tentative Ruling:

GRANT as to Special Interrogatories nos. 2, 6, 9,11 and 13.

BMW’s response to no. 2 is not responsive to the call of the question. For no. 6, if the question requires reference to another document, the document should be identified and its contents summarized. In no. 9, BMW’s response is vague. Does BMW maintain there are no defects that are responsive, or does BMW maintain only there are no

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share