DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CVRI2502928·riverside·Civil·Discovery
Hearing todayGRANTED

TNRD MANAGEMENT, LLC vs LE

MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT CHRISTINA D’ANGELO’S RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION, SET ONE

Hearing date
Aug 18, 2026
Department
3
Judge
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$510

Parties

PlaintiffTNRD MANAGEMENT, LLC
DefendantLE
DefendantCHRISTINA D’ANGELO

Ruling

Association’s Governing Documents and that the Association was not obligated to take further actions until LGR submitted complete applications as detailed in its September 2, 2023 letters. LGR does not dispute the fact that its plans did not comply with many of the architectural standards listed in the letters, including the noncompliance with the 20- foot height limit. Once the burden shifted, LGR has not presented sufficient controverting evidence to raise a triable issue of facts as to whether the Association’s actions were improper.

Ruling

Grant summary judgment.

4. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT TNRD MANAGEMENT, CHRISTINA D'ANGELO'S

LLC vs LE RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION, SET ONE Tentative Ruling:

The unopposed motion is granted. Sanctions are awarded in the amount of $510.

5. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT TNRD MANAGEMENT, CHRISTINA D'ANGELO'S

LLC vs LE RESPONSES TO FORM INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE Tentative Ruling:

The unopposed motion is granted. Sanctions are awarded in the amount of $310.

6. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT TNRD MANAGEMENT, CHRISTINA D'ANGELO'S

LLC vs LE RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE Tentative Ruling:

The unopposed motion is granted. Sanctions are awarded in the amount of $310.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share