April Parker Foundation, Inc. vs. The Orange County Health Authority

and is then aware that it is causing injury to the victim.” (Thing v. La Chusa, supra, 48 Cal.3d at p. 702), such that he “contemporaneously and sensorily perceived” the event.

The Plaintiffs cite to several cases that were decided after Thing v. La Chusa, such as Reisner v. Regents of University of California (1995) 31 Cal.App.4th 1195; Ewing v. Goldstein (2004) 120 Cal.App.4th 807; Williams v. Superior Court (1994) 30 Cal.App.4th 318, and Gutierrez v. Tostado (2025) 18 Cal.5th 222

However, all of these cases are distinguishable and do not apply here.

Defendants Salman N.M. Okour, M.D. and Francis Chang, M.D. shall give notice of this ruling.

2 Bevli vs. Desai Demurrer and Motion to Strike

There is no written tentative ruling at this 30-2024-01413516 time. The court may give an indication of its thinking at oral argument and will hear from the parties or their counsel at that time.

3 April Parker Foundation, Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel Inc. vs. The Orange County Health Authority There is no written tentative ruling at this time. The court is concerned whether Petitioner April Parker Foundation, Inc. will 30-2026-01553304 be prejudiced by the withdrawal of counsel because its opening brief is due in approximately 3 1⁄2 weeks.

4 Solaia Capital Motion to Strike or Tax Costs Management LLC vs. Kairos Manford Private There is no written tentative ruling at this Equity Fund I LP time. The court will hear from the parties or their counsel at oral argument.

30-2021-01233896