DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV448840·santaclara·Civil·Construction Litigation
Hearing in about 18 hoursGRANTED

Skanska-Shimmick-Herzog v. LAN/T.Y. Lin., et al.

Verified Application of Logan S. Brundage to appear pro hac vice

Hearing date
Aug 19, 2026
Department
16
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSkanska-Shimmick-Herzog
DefendantLAN/T.Y. Lin.
Cross-DefendantHatch Associates Consultants, Inc.

Attorneys

Logan S. Brundagefor Cross-Defendant

Ruling

9:01 24CV448840 Skanska-Shimmick-Herzog Hearing on Verified Application of 6 v. Logan S. Brundage to appear pro hac LAN/T.Y. Lin., et al. vice for Cross-Defendant Hatch Associates Consultants, Inc.

The Verified Application of Logan S. Brundage to appear pro hac vice for Cross- Defendant Hatch Associates Consultants, Inc. is well supported and complies with California Rule of Court 9.40.

Accordingly, the Verified Application is GRANTED in all respects.

After this hearing, the Court will sign and file the Proposed Order that was filed with this Application.

SO ORDERED

9:00 25CV457216 Jayanthi Rangarajan Order on Defendants’ Demurrer to 1 v. Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint Sutter Law Firm PC, et al. As the parties have advised the Court that this case has settled, this Demurrer is OFF CALENDER.

SO ORDERED.

9:00 25CV461206 Beverly Ann Land Order on Defendant Ford Motor 2 v. Company’s Motion for Judgment on Ford Motor Company, et al. the Pleadings

As the moving party Defendant Ford Motor Company on August 12, 2026 withdrew this Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, this Motion is OFF CALENDER.

SO ORDERED.

7

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share